10-08
Oral History
I will have to admit; at first, I did not understand why
oral history was given an entire section. When I think of oral history, I think
of a time long before print, even before legitimate handwriting. To me, it
seems that just like physical script (hand written) history, that oral history
was well on its way out and being replaced by advancements in technology.
Not surprisingly, I was wrong. As it turns out, technology
is opening new doors into oral history. In the third link, the article
discusses the benefits and opportunities reviving oral history with technology
can accomplish. I can not argue that hearing stories, and history (anything for
that matter) adds depth and heightens memory. Actually, seeing as though I
always like to refer back to education, I think it would do schools a lot of
good to incorporate more oral history into the classroom. If nothing else or
for not other benefit, some students are audio learners which is a learning
style much forgotten after story time in the first grade. Hearing a story about
history allows for students to run in their imagination, follow along and see
the story in their own minds as it is played out over the speaker system. This
same article points out that databases of interviews, histories, etc. could be
complied and strung together by common words and phrases. With just the few
strokes of the keys one could narrow down their search and access to these
interviews, an extremely helpful research tool that would enrich and expand
knowledge. I know that there were many times in school where it was required
for research that we complete interviews or listen to someone speak about our
topic. Students would hem and haw about how to go about doing this and it was
often left undone or taken off the requirements because of its
impossibility. Because of this, I think
this kind of oral history would be wildly successful in the educational sense.
One last
bit though, maybe this is because I am a tad old fashion, but I am a bit
saddened that physical oral history is seen less and less. Sure, it is much
easier to type into a search engine to find a refugee talk about their
experience, but how much better it is to see and hear. Like stories of the Indian
tales passed down from generation to generation, hearing these from a computer
would simply be missing something that can only be found in presence of the
history itself.
Be careful to keep separate oral history as a source for historians and oral history as a method of communicating history. The term is usually used for interviewing as a source, but your reflections in the other direction are interesting
ReplyDelete